By Stefan Larsson
Via an research of copyright in a electronic context, Stefan Larssonś Conceptions within the Code explains the position that metaphor performs within the law's dealing with of technological switch. It makes an important contribution to sociolegal research in addition to conceptual metaphor theory.
summary: via an research of copyright in a electronic context, Stefan Larssonś Conceptions within the Code explains the function that metaphor performs within the law's dealing with of technological swap. It makes an important contribution to sociolegal research in addition to conceptual metaphor idea
Read or Download Conceptions in the code: how metaphors explain legal challenges in digital times PDF
Similar intellectual property books
Exam of 7 well-known trials, each one concluding with an review of the trial by way of a legal professional, pass judgement on, legislations professor, or verbal exchange pupil. The Washington submit assurance of the loo Hinckley case previous the trial demonstrates the consequences media can have on an ordeal. The Haymarket rebel trial serves as an instance of starting statements in a storytelling shape.
Knowing highbrow estate, safeguarding your ideasIntellectual estate is continually in danger, and the security of chemical technological know-how and expertise during the patenting method permits members and corporations to guard their labor. yet with a purpose to actually be ready to safeguard your principles, you want to comprehend the fundamentals of patenting for your self.
A realistic method of company IP operations and implementationIntellectual estate Operations and Implementation is helping executives, lawyers, accountants, managers, and proprietors, comprehend the felony, technological, fiscal, and cultural adjustments that experience affected company IP possession and administration.
- The Trademark Guide: A Friendly Handbook to Protecting and Profiting from Trademarks, Second Edition (Business and Legal Forms)
- Change of State: Information, Policy, and Power (MIT Press)
- Fair Use, Free Use, and Use by Permission: How to Handle Copyrights in All Media
- Essentials of Intellectual Property (Essentials Series), Edition: 1st
- Innovation, Intellectual Property, and Economic Growth
- Software Reuse in the Emerging Cloud Computing Era
Extra info for Conceptions in the code: how metaphors explain legal challenges in digital times
186) This conception in the legal field has been durable and strong. The British philosopher Jeremy Bentham believed that metaphors were the antithesis to legal reasoning (Bentham and Ogden, 1931). The traditional legal perception of the unimportant place and function of metaphors in law is, in other words, 35 C onceptions in the C ode completely at odds with what language and cognition research has shown from 1980 onwards. e. how thinking works in relation to legal concepts and legal decision making (Johnson, 2007).
The answer can reasonably be expected to indicate the 23 C onceptions in the C ode intended audience. It should be pointed out that this book is not based at the heart of a unilateral scientific discipline; rather, it moves between several disciplines. Its most significant contributions and links are probably to legal doctrine in a broader sense—which include sociology of law—as well as aforementioned cognitive science. It also incorporates a recently emerging field that studies digitalisation and its social impact, which for the sake of simplicity can be referred to as technological and social change, which to some parts resembles what is done in Science and Technology Studies (STS).
From an empirical account, it became clear that there were different conceptions of online file-sharing at play. The justifications were analysed within a range of ‘it’s unstoppable’ to ‘culture in general doesn’t suffer’ and ‘it’s democratic’ (Andersson Schwarz and Larsson, 2014, pp. 223–24) and many additional categories were defined on the basis of the respondents’ answers. In brief, how the role and effects of online file-sharing were conceptualised—a process in which metaphors played an important role—affected the respondents’ normative justifications.