By Lionel Bently, Brad Sherman
This publication is the 1st specific historic account of highbrow estate legislations. partially, it examines why highbrow estate legislation with its subcategories of patents, copyright, designs and exchange marks took the form that it did over the process the 19th century. furthermore the authors take care of ways that the legislations supplies estate prestige to intangibles and describe how the legislations got here to create strategies that enabled it to acknowledge protectable intangibles, and the inescapable difficulties that experience arisen from their use.
Read or Download The Making of Modern Intellectual Property Law: The British Experience, 1760–1911 (Cambridge Intellectual Property and Information Law) PDF
Best intellectual property books
Exam of 7 well-known trials, every one concluding with an assessment of the trial by means of a attorney, pass judgement on, legislation professor, or conversation pupil. The Washington submit assurance of the toilet Hinckley case previous the trial demonstrates the results media can have on an ordeal. The Haymarket rebellion trial serves for example of establishing statements in a storytelling shape.
Realizing highbrow estate, safeguarding your ideasIntellectual estate is consistently in danger, and the safety of chemical technology and expertise in the course of the patenting procedure permits contributors and firms to guard their exertions. yet on the way to really have the capacity to guard your rules, you want to comprehend the fundamentals of patenting for your self.
A realistic method of company IP operations and implementationIntellectual estate Operations and Implementation is helping executives, lawyers, accountants, managers, and vendors, comprehend the felony, technological, monetary, and cultural alterations that experience affected company IP possession and administration.
- Intellectual Property in the New Millennium: Essays in Honour of William R. Cornish
- Toward A More Balanced Approach: Rethinking and Readjusting Copyright Systems in the Digital Network Era
- Patently Innovative: How Pharmaceutical Firms Use Emerging Patent Law to Extend Monopolies on Blockbuster Drugs (Woodhead Publishing Series in Biomedicine)
- Countering Brandjacking in the Digital Age: … and Other Hidden Risks to Your Brand (SpringerBriefs in Computer Science)
- School Administrators and Technology: Meeting the Standards
- The Legal Protection of Databases: A Comparative Analysis
Extra resources for The Making of Modern Intellectual Property Law: The British Experience, 1760–1911 (Cambridge Intellectual Property and Information Law)
1771), Lord Monboddo Reporter, 7. As Pocock explained, `property was no longer de®ned within an unchanging structure of norms but was understood to exist within a historical process': J. Pocock, Virtue, Commerce and History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985), 115. J. Locke, Two Treatises of Government (1690) (ed. P. Laslett) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1967), sect. 27. While Locke was sometimes explicitly used (as in Millar v Taylor (1769) 98 ER 201; Tonson v Collins (1760) 96 ER 180 citing Locke's Two Treatises of Government, Part 2, ch.
Brewer, Three Sinews of Power: War, Money and the English State, 1688±1783 (London: Century Hutchinson, 1988), esp. ch. 8. Cf. J. Innes, `Parliament and the Shaping of Eighteenth-century English Social Policy' (1990) 5th series 40 Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 63±92 (a critique of the traditional view of the eighteenth-century House of Commons as an inef®cient and unsystematic legislative body). An Act for Encouraging the Art of Making New Models and Casts of Busts, and other Things therein Mentioned, 38 Geo.
W. Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England (London: A. Strahan, 1809), Book II, chs. 13±19. Drawing upon the writings of Puffendorf and Grotius, these arguments were referring to the Roman law doctrine whereby one might establish an estate simply by taking possession of unclaimed land. See W. Blackstone, Commentaries (1809), Book II, ch. 26, 400. Millar v Taylor (1769) 98 ER 230. Ibid. On the need for a physical presence (or a proxy) in the occupancy argument see L. Becker, Property Rights: Philosophic Foundations (London: Routledge, 1977), 24±31.